Period Underwear Brand Thinx Settles $5million Lawsuit Over Potentially Harmful Chemicals In Menstrual Pants | Glamour UK
PFAS in period underwear: Should you be worrying? - CNA Lifestyle
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR
What to Know About PFAS in Thinx and Other Period Underwear - The New York Times
Thinx 'non-toxic' period panties settles $5M lawsuit over harmful chemicals
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US | PFAS | The Guardian
Thinx Settles Class-Action Lawsuit Over Harmful Chemicals Being Found In Period Underwear Despite Being Marketed As Non-Toxic | Evie Magazine
Toxic PFAS Chemicals Found in Period-Proof Underwear | Environmental Working Group
The Thinx Lawsuit About Its Period Underwear Isn't Fazing All Users
Thinx period underwear settles class action lawsuit over possibly causing fertility issues | Daily Mail Online
Up to 65% of period underwear contains toxic forever chemicals linked to infertility | Daily Mail Online
Period underwear may contain troubling chemicals—but the real problem is much bigger
It Needs A Marketing U-turn': Can Thinx Bounce Back After Toxic Lawsuit? | The Drum
Thinx Responds to a Report That Claims Its Products Contain Toxic Chemicals | Teen Vogue
The New York Times on X: "The period underwear brand Thinx made public that it reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit claiming its products contain harmful chemicals, known as PFAS
Thinx period underwear may contain toxic chemicals | Dazed
Thinx period underwear was supposed to be 'non-toxic'. Now customers feel betrayed | Menstruation | The Guardian
What to Know About the Thinx Class-Action Settlement